nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.48 13-24
基于CFD的直翼舵桨结构参数对水动力特性的影响
基金项目(Foundation): 浙江省科技计划项目“领雁”研发攻关计划(2023C01245)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13788/j.cnki.cbgc.2026.02.02
摘要:

[目的]为了分析直翼舵桨推进器结构参数选型和性能优化方面存在的不足,[方法]以FSDJ-400RE-C型直翼舵桨为研究对象,采用基于计算流体力学(CFD)数值模拟方法构建数学模型,对其水动力性能进行仿真分析。通过对进速系数J取值为0~2.4时的数值仿真结果与试验数据进行对比,验证构建的数学模型的准确性,其中:J=2.0工况下的效率偏差仅为6.628 5%。在此基础上,以J=2.0为代表工况,对桨叶长度、弦长和厚度等主要结构参数的压力场、速度场和水动力特性曲线进行对比分析,并以单一参数下桨叶水动力最优为条件进行参数组合仿真计算。[结果]结果表明:当桨叶长度为1 260 mm、弦长为510 mm、厚度为60 mm时,单参数下的水动力性能最优,但最优参数组合并非简单的叠加最优;以桨叶长度L为基准,当桨叶弦长C与L的比值为0.405、桨叶厚度T与C的比值为0.118时,直翼舵桨的水动力特性达到最佳状态。[结论]研究成果可供直翼舵桨的水动力性能预报、桨叶机构设计和优化参考。

Abstract:

[Purpose] Addressing the current research gap in structural parameter selection and performance optimization for straight-bladed rudder propellers, [Method] computational fluid dynamics Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) based numerical simulation is employed to conduct systematic hydrodynamic performance analysis on the FSDJ-400 RE-C model. By comparing simulation results with experimental data across different operating conditions(J=0~2.4), the accuracy of the constructed model is validated, with an efficiency deviation of only 6.628 5% at J=2.0. Based on this, J=2.0 is selected as the representative operating condition. Comparative analyses are conducted on the pressure field, velocity field, and hydrodynamic characteristic curves for key structural parameters including blade length, chord length, and thickness. Furthermore, parametric combination simulations are performed to optimize hydrodynamic performance under single-parameter conditions. [Result] The results indicate that optimal hydrodynamic performance under single-parameter conditions is achieved when the blade length is 1 260 mm, chord length is 510 mm, and thickness is 60 mm. However, the optimal parameter combination is not simply the sum of the optimal individual parameters. Using blade length L as the reference, the hydrodynamic characteristics of the straight-wing rudder propeller reached their optimal state when the chord ratio C/L=0.405 and the thickness ratio T/C=0.118. [Conclusion] It provides effective support for hydrodynamic performance prediction, blade mechanism design, and optimization of straight-wing rudder propellers.

参考文献

[1]黄佳林,陈昌运.船用直翼推进器研究[J].上海船舶运输科学研究所学报, 2007(2):88-95.HUANG J L, CHEN C Y. Research on Ship Propellers with Straight Wings[J]. Journal of Shanghai Institute of Ship Transportation Science, 2007(2):88-95.

[2]LI T, HU J, WANG Y Z, et al. Hydrodynamic Analysis of Cycloidal Propellers[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022, 17(9):2116-2129.

[3]周旭峰.摆线推进器的复合运动机理及实验研究[D].南京:东南大学, 2022.ZHOU X F. The Composite Motion Mechanism and Experimental Study of a Cycloidal Actuator[D]. Nanjing:Southeast University, 2022.

[4]HU X D, ZHOU Y Q. Computational Fluid Dynamics Research on Pressure Loss of Cross-Flow Perforated Muffler[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2007, 20(2):88-93.

[5]李冠男,冯峰,杨玉良,等.摆线推进器水动力特性三维模拟[J].船舶工程, 2023, 45(7):100-108.LI G N, FENG F, YANG Y L, et al. Three-Dimensional Simulation of the Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Cycloidal Propeller[J]. Ship Engineering, 2023, 45(7):100-108.

[6]钱正芳,胡健,张纬康.摆线推进器水动力性能和流场结构预报方法研究[J].中国造船, 2018, 59(4):124-133.QIAN Z F, HU J, ZHANG W K. Study on Hydrodynamic Performance and Flow Field Structure Prediction Methods of Cycloidal Propellers[J]. China Shipbuilding, 2018, 59(4):124-133.

[7]刘柏辰,冯峰,杨玉良,等.多连杆式摆线推进器运动特性分析及结构设计[J].船舶工程, 2023, 45(12):101-107.LIU B C, FENG F, YANG Y L, et al. Analysis of the Motion Characteristics and Structural Design of a Multi-Link Cycloidal Propeller[J]. Ship Engineering,2023, 45(12):101-107.

[8]张之卓.基于CFD的三维线性摆线推进器性能优化研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2016.ZHANG Z Z. A Study on the Performance Optimization of a Three-Dimensional Linear Cycloid Propeller Based on CFD[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University,2016.

[9]李海涛,王代斌.不同偏心角摆线推进器水动力性能数值模拟[J].大连理工大学学报, 2024, 64(2):173-181.LI H T, WANG D B. Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamic Performance of Epicycloidal Propellers with Different Eccentricity Angles[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2024, 64(2):173-181.

[10]史俊武,丁晨,刘爱兵,等.基于CFD的直翼推进器水动力性能研究及参数影响分析[J].船舶力学, 2021,25(2):183-192.SHI J W, DING C, LIU A B, et al. Study on the Hydrodynamic Performance of Straight-Wing Propellers Based on CFD and Analysis of Parameter Effects[J].Ship Mechanics, 2021, 25(2):183-192.

[11]顾欣星.全向直翼推进器水动力性能研究及优化[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2016.GU X X. Research and Optimization of Hydrodynamic Performance of Omnidirectional Straight-Wing Propellers[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2016.

[12]中国船级社.直翼舵桨装置技术指南[S]. 2017.China Classification Society. Technical Guidelines for Straight Wing Rudder Propeller Devices[S]. 2017.

[13]GENEVA N, ZABARAS N. Quantifying Model Form Uncertainty in Reynolds-Averaged Turbulence Models with Bayesian Deep Neural Networks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 383:125-147.

[14]董世汤,王国强,唐登海,等.船舶推进器水动力学[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2009.DONG S T, WANG G Q, TANG D H, et al.Hydrodynamics of Ship Propulsion Systems[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2009.

[15]温正,石良臣,任毅如. FLUENT流体计算应用教程[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2009.WEN Z, SHI L C, REN Y R. FLUENT Fluid Computation Application Tutorial[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2009.

[16]中国船级社.基于计算流体力学(CFD)的内河船舶航速功率评估指南[S]. 2023.China Classification Society. Guidelines for Speed and Power Assessment of Inland Waterway Vessels Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD)[S]. 2023.

[17]FICKEN N L, DICKERSON M C. Experimental Performance and Steering Characteristics of Cycloidal Propellers[R]. 1969.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13788/j.cnki.cbgc.2026.02.02

中图分类号:U664.3

引用信息:

[1]温小飞,胡昌龙,黄佳林,等.基于CFD的直翼舵桨结构参数对水动力特性的影响[J].船舶工程,2026,48(02):13-24.DOI:10.13788/j.cnki.cbgc.2026.02.02.

基金信息:

浙江省科技计划项目“领雁”研发攻关计划(2023C01245)

发布时间:

2026-02-25

出版时间:

2026-02-25

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文